Lucian
Did the first humans originate in one place on Earth, then adapt to environments in different locations? Did the different physiological appearance of races evolve because of cultural/environmental factors, and affecting the environment?

I lived in one home during primary school and one since then.  I feel connected to them (memory of geography) as a part of my life and also in people around me.

Laptops, computers and smart phones are likely to merge, and combine with cars and homes in the future, where technology in our times has limited medical and job-related benefits.  The longer-term technology companies may be investing in automation software, while the continued existence of humans means there will be the need for education and entertainment software and hardware.

I examined  the definition of indigeneity and was reminded that they have broader goals than land rights.  I felt that having geographical connection to my life was similar  to indigenous communities.

I wondered whether all cultures will develop in the same way (whether technology development will be universal) and what the other students' comments on my museum items, my own programming language List Prolog (given it might help, in a similarity checked manner with automating programming, and, therefore essay writing) and my blog (which may have helped develop culture in our times).   Perhaps the people of the future will be aware of the type of programming language in our times that would be produced to run simulated intelligence-produced programs and look back to, e.g. examine local trends in reducing miscarriages the blog may have help cause.

Which limits do you face in your everyday life?
Time limits-prevented by choosing well

I think the interstitial space, e.g. between setting up automation and not having to repeat work will figure in the future.  Time may be retrievable and long term relationships the highest goal.  People's lifestyle will be the most important quality to perfect.

People's current fame will diverge from them in the future (i.e. algorithms will become obsolete, anything that robots can replace will need to be updated), unless they can produce a work relevant to the future (e.g. creative works, algorithms that are philosophical in nature and essays that strike a human, not a current-based chord).  People looking back on the past may have confirmed this, and past discoveries were/will be famous only if they were/are at the cutting edge.

Should we be charged for water
I agree, and water should be tested to see if it depends on animal ecosystems, i.e. the prevention of extinctions.

I have access to water in my home and partner's home, however this needs to be put in check because my partner's house requires delivery of water, meaning it needs to be rationed.  In remote Australia this is also true, and the climate can prevent natural water collection.

Access to water, like other methods for subsistence, is a right, not a privilege.

We have water delivered here, and I use it to cook, clean, wash myself, water the garden and quench our pets.

I considered whether water should be paid for, and think it is hard to leave the city water system. Water should be researched to avoid environmental disaster and conflict in the future, i.e. mining runoff or mining alternatives.

I agree.  People can survive without computers and planes and gas but not water.

People and the environment need each other.  Anthropology and ethnography have enabled me to be critical of misuse of the environment and write philosophy about verificationalist technology.

I have learned to answer the question  more clearly.  I agree with  enough water access.  I liked the interview style of the course.I think it is a shame that governments allow the "boom" style mining of natural resources, and wish they could put effort into academic pursuits instead.  There would still be enough money for universal pensions, etc.

I would like to research perfect government, from a  green angle.  I was concerned about the computers and planes in the last segment, and even see why Brexit, etc. exist (which might contribute to keeping travel to a minimum) but I would like inter-country communication using green means to continue.